Claude vs Microsoft Copilot

Detailed comparison of Claude and Microsoft Copilot. See which tool is best for your specific needs.

Anthropic's assistant, strongest on long documents and agentic coding

Starting atFree

OpenAI models embedded across Microsoft 365 and Windows

Starting atFree

Feature	Claude	Microsoft Copilot
Starting Price	Free	Free
Free Tier
Context Window	1M tokens	Varies by surface
Vision Input
Reasoning Mode
Open Weights
Web Search
API Access
API Access
Top Pros	1M-token context at standard pricing on Opus, Sonnet and Fable — no long-context surcharge Output pricing undercuts the OpenAI flagship ($25 vs $30 / 1M on the top mainstream tier) Strongest reported results on agentic coding and long-horizon autonomous work	Native integration across Word, Excel, Outlook, Teams and Windows Enterprise administration, compliance and tenant data boundaries Included in some existing Microsoft 365 agreements
Main Cons	Fable tier is expensive at $10 / $50 per 1M and requires 30-day data retention Smaller consumer feature surface than ChatGPT (no native image generation) No open-weight route	$30/user/month on top of an existing Microsoft 365 licence No direct API — you cannot build on it the way you can on OpenAI or Anthropic Model access lags the underlying OpenAI releases
Best For	codinglong documentsagentsanalysis	enterprisemicrosoft 365productivityteams

Other popular comparisons